Albert D. Spalding, JD, CPA/CFF, Associate Professor

School of Business Administration , Department of Accounting
100 William C. Rands House5229 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202-3930
Telephone (313) 577-4469 / Fax (313) 577-2000
Email:  aspalding@wayne.edu
This course is reserved exclusively for graduate students formally admitted to the University. This course serves as a required course in the M.B.A. program and an elective course in the M.S. in Taxation or the M.S. in Accounting programs. From time to time, graduate students in other programs (law, public administration, etc.) take this course. Students who have already taken the online course, ACC 7310, Business and Professional Ethics for Managers and Accountants, may also take this course, and vice-versa. 
This course is an online course, with two in-class meetings.
Meanwhile, please note that "online" does not mean "easier" or "self-paced." "Online" also does not mean that everything in the course is done so as to optimize student convenience.
The final calculated grade is a composite of the grades received for examinations, written submissions, participation in discussion, etc. Based upon the percentage of total points earned in each category, final grades as a percentage of total available points are as follows: 92.0 to 100 = A; 90.0 to 91.9 = A- ; 87.0 to 89.9 = B+;  82.0 to 86.9 = B;  80 to 81.9 = B-; 77.0 to 79.9 = C+;  72.0 to 76.9 = C;  70.0 to 71.9 = C-; Below 70.0 = E. A GRADE OF "INCOMPLETE" IS NOT AVAILABLE. The various components of the final grade are:


Approx.
Points**
Approx.
Percent**
Task Points (See the "Points" page of the Syllabus): Email assignments, Quizzes, Surveys,  Discussion Board participation, Research Paper presentation, etc., including slack points. 295
20 %
Ethical Analysis
100
7 %
Mid-Term Exams
300 21 %
Argumentative Essay
100
7 %
Research Paper 200 14 %
Final Exam 450 31 %

The final grade is based upon the student's numeric scores, not the related letter grade associated with each component. See How to Study for an Online Section of BA 7070 for more information.
This drop deadline is the last day on which Prof. Spalding approve a request to withdraw from this course.
This withdrawal policy for this course does not affect tuition and fees, since there is no tuition cancellation provision or tuition refund for withdrawn courses. For information regarding University dates pertaining to tuition cancellation and other matters, consult the University schedule. If you have specific questions about course registration or drop procedures at the School of Business Administration, consult your student adviser.
Most assignments, readings, and announcements for this course will be listed below or posted on the Blackboard site for this course, at least a week ahead of time. Any last minute changes, including any cancellations or other last minute change, affecting this course, will be posted on the Blackboard site for this course. If there is a power outage on Main Campus or other emergency resulting in the cancellation of classes at Wayne State University, all assignments due for that day continue to be due as scheduled. The Internet does not shut down for emergencies, so simply submit all discussion board postings, surveys, online exams, and all other assignments as scheduled below irrespective of any weather or other emergency. If you usually use a Wayne State University campus computer for these assignments, but you discover that that Wayne State computer facility is closed for any reason, simply find your way to a public library, cybercafe, friend's house, employer work station, or other Internet-accessible computer so that you are able to receive credit for timely submitted work, since no credit is given for late submissions under late submissions.

F1/F2 International Students

The U. S. Department of Homeland Security has recently established regulations for F1 students taking online classes. Specifically, if you have F1 visa status and are taking more than one online class in a semester, you need to provide proof that you are physically present for at least two meetings with your instructor for each online class. F1 (international) students who are taking online or distance learning classes that do not require you to physically be present on campus for an exam, a class meeting, or other purposes relating to the class can use only one class or three credits per semester toward the full course of study requirement. For example, if you are an undergraduate student enrolled in 12 credit hours, you can only count one class or 3 credit hours of online study or distance learning classes toward the full course of study requirement for that particular semester if no physical presence on campus is required. Therefore, F1 (international) students taking more than one (3 hr.) class online per semester are now required to come to campus at least twice per semester to physically meet with their instructor. The Office of International Students and Scholars [in the Welcome Center (42 W. Warren) at WSU (Tel: 313-577-3422, Fax: 313-577-2962, e-mail: oismail@wayne.edu)] will provide F1 students with a form for faculty to sign verifying these two meetings per online course each semester, and it is the student's responsibility to contact the faculty member regarding the need to meet. F1 students who choose to meet their in-person requirement in this course, should plan to present their research in person, and should plan to take Part Three of the final exam in person.

Academic Integrity

Strict compliance with the Wayne State University Academic Integrity policies and the Student Code of Conduct are required in this course. Any cheating (including collaboration among students on quizzes or exams), fabrication, plagiarism, or other academic dishonesty will result in an automatic grade of E for this entire course, irrespective of the specific context or assessment involved (quiz, research paper, exam, etc.). In addition, charges will be filed with the Judicial Officer of the Dean of Students Office. For more information, see the Student Code of Conduct brochure. There is zero tolerance of academic dishonesty in this course.

Schedule of Assignments

Subject to Change - Check Back Often

Note:  if you have trouble with some of the links on this page,
try accessing this page from a campus computer,
or by configuring your browser to the WSU proxy server.
Unit and Due 
Dates and Times†
Readings Due Prior to Discussion and Quiz (Draw from these Readings when Completing Discussion and Quiz
Due at 6:00 p.m.
Discussion Questions, Completed on Discussion Board Prior to Deadline
Due at 6:00 p.m. However, when there is both a Part A and a Part B, Part A initial Discussion Board postings, are Due at 6:00 p.m. Part B Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00p.m. Do not separately label your postings as "A" or "B". 
Other Items Due to be Submitted Prior to Deadline
Due at 6:00 p.m.:
09/14/2009, Monday
Introduction

Note: Survey # 1,  First Email Assignment, Initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3), and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009, but may be submitted earlier. Quiz # 1 is also due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009, but is not available until 09/20/2009, per the Quizzes and Surveys (Online Section) page of this syllabus.
Primary Readings: Carefully and deliberately read this syllabus, including all pages of this syllabus linked at the bottom of this syllabus. Pay special attention to the following page of the Syllabus:
How to Study for BA 7070. View the two introductory lectures on Blackboard, Introduction to BA 7070 and  Introduction to Ethics, taking careful notes.
Additional Required Readings: Also read the following articles, found at the Course Documents page of Blackboard: Joseph R. DesJardins, "Virtues and Business Ethics"; Amitai Etzioni "When It Comes to Ethics, B-Schools Get an F," Washington Post, August 4, 2002; Younkins, Edward W., "Morality and Character Development: The Roles of Capitalism, Commerce, and the Corporation;" Maital, Shlomo, "More than Greed" (Available in the Course Documents section of Blackboard). Also read Pointers for Structuring Written Arguments.
Correct your address on Pipeline if you are not using the University AccessID as your primary email. Log in to WSU Pipeline  and click the "Account" icon in the upper right hand corner of the page. In the "Account Management Menu", click "Set Mail Forwarding". Specify your primary email address, and desired options, and click "OK". Make sure your email address on Pipeline is precisely accurate, so that you will not miss out on any emails "broadcast" to the entire class from the Blackboard system. For example, Survey # 1, the First Email Assignment, the initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3), and the Baseline Quiz are due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009, but may be submitted earlier (even if you have not started your readings in this course).
09/21/2009, Monday
Unit One:

Survey # 1,  First Email Assignment, Initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3), Quiz # 1 and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/20099.
U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3 Replies are Due at 11:00  p.m. on  09/21/2009.
Note: Survey # 1,  First Email Assignment, initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3), and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009, but may be submitted earlier. Quiz # 1 is also due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009, but is not available until 09/20/2009 per the Quizzes and Surveys (Online Section) page of this syllabus.
Primary Readings: Chapter 1, The Nature of Morality; Case 1.1 ("Dumped"); Case 1.2 ("A7D Affair"); Case 9.1 ("Unprofessional Conduct"); Case 11.4 ("Consenting to Sexual Harrassment");  Case 11.5 ("Facial Discrimination"); Reading, p. 36 (Solomon, "It's Good Business");  Reading, p. 45 (Luban et al, "Moral Responsibility"); Reading, p. 650 ("Job Discrimination and Gay Rights");
Additional Required Readings:
Dunham, Kemba, "Right and Wrong:  What's Ethical in Business?," Wall Street Journal, Jan. 11, 1999;
Alan Murray, "Executive's Fatal Flaw: Failing to Understand New Demands on CEOs"  Wall Street Journal, January 4, 2007, Page A1;
Beckey Bright, "Managing Corporate Social Responsibility," Wall Street Journal, Mar 03, 2007;
Alan Murray, "After the Revolt, Creating a New CEO," Wall Street Journal, May 5, 2007, Page A1;
Ron Alsop, "Why Teaching of Ethics Continues to Be Lacking," Wall Street Journal, June 19, 2007, Page B7;  Phred Dvorak, "Finding the Best Measure of 'Corporate Citizenship'" Wall Street Journal, June 20, 2007, Page C1.
(Note: Only these six Wall Street Journal readings are available in the Course Documents area of the Blackboard site for this course; for information about all future Wall Street Journal readings, see below.)
Unit 1, Discussion 1: After reading the Discussion Board page of the syllabus from top to bottom, introduce yourself, on the Blackboard Discussion Board site for this course, to the other students in this course. Include general employment information and/or any other information you would care to share with your classmates. Describe your MBA/MS degree experience to date, and expectations from your graduate studies. You may, if you wish, attach a photo of yourself. Due by 6:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 1(Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U1D1 expectations, experience, or other observations. Feel free to enter into a respectful discussion, regarding expectations, employment, education, etc. Due by 11:00 p.m.
Unit 1, Discussion 2: Page 45, Question 7. Give a full analysis and explanation for your conclusion(s). Do not repeat another student's prior analysis. Due by 6:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 2(Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U1D2 analysis. Due by 11:00 p.m.
Unit 1, Discussion 3:  Respond to the following question (and feel free to enter into discussion with other students):  "Is greed wrong?  Explain."  Avoid equivocation and answers such as, "It depends."  Come to a specific Yes or No conclusion, and justify your answer. Draw from the readings (especially Chapter 1), and outside research on the Web or otherwise, to justify your answer. Cite all references in a bibliography at the end of your posting, using the Turabian/Chicago style. Due by 6:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 3(Reply): Provide a at least one constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U1D3 analysis. Due by 11:00 p.m.
Survey # 1,  First Email Assignment, Initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3), and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009, but may be submitted earlier. Quiz # 1 on Unit One lectures, readings, etc., is also due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/21/2009 but is not available until 09/20/2009 per the Quizzes and Surveys page of this syllabus. 
U1D1, U1D2, and U1D3 Replies are Due at 11:00  p.m. on  09/21/2009 
After 09/21/2009
Start on your first Ethical Analysis, which may be uploaded onto the Discussion Board any time before its due date and time.
09/28/2009, Monday
Unit Two

Survey # 2,  Initial Unit 2 Discussions (U2D1 and U2D2), Quiz #2, and first Digital DropBox Assignment are Due at 6:00 p.m. on  09/28/2009

Discussion Board Unit 2 Replies are Due at 11:00 p.m. on  09/28/2009



 

Primary Readings: Shaw and Barry, Chapter 2: Normative Theories of Ethics; Case 2.1 ("Hacking into Harvard"); Case 2.3 ("Blood"); Case 8.2 ("Web Porn at Work"); Case 9.1 ("Unprofessional Conduct"); Case 9.2 ("Testing for Honesty"); Reading, p.94 (Hare, "One Philosopher's Approach"); Reading, p. 100 (Green, "Moral Justification"); Hasnas, John, "The Normative Theories of Business Ethics:  A Guide for the Perplexed," Business Ethics Quarterly (Jan. 1998).; Damer:  Introduction, and Chapters I, II, and III; Definitions of Malum in Se versus Malum Prohibitum; Toulmin Model of Argument; Toulmin ArgumentationToulmin Example; Argumentation and Critical Thinking Rhetoric.
Additional Required Readings: 
Loretta Chao, "Hero Worship in Software Piracy Case Complicates China Efforts" Wall Street Journal, Sep 1, 2009, Page B.1;
David Kesmodel, Lauren Etter, and Alicia Mundy, "Corporate News: Tobacco Giants Challenge Law" Wall Street Journal, Sep 1, 2009. p. B.3;



Unit 2, Discussion 1:  Describe a "real life" ethical dilemma or moral choice faced by you or a fellow worker in recent years. If you cannot think of an idea, read through the federal government's Encyclopedia of Ethical Failure for ideas. Explain how it was or was not resolved, and explain (using the Toulmin model) how it should have been resolved and why. Remember not to disclose specific trade secrets or confidential information about your employer, client, etc. Draw from normative theories of ethics as part of your analysis. Unit 2, Discussion 1 (Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U2D1 analysis. Again, draw from normative theories of ethics as part of your analysis.
Unit 2, Discussion 2:  How does a person's worldview in regard to God, religion or faith, impact his or her approach to the idea of Warrant (under the Toulmin method)? As part of your answer to this discussion question, explain how a person of faith (that is, whose worldview is informed by his or her faith) might be able to have a constructive intellectual discourse about ethical claims with a person who is an atheist, agnostic, or otherwise not necessarily a person of faith? Unit 2, Discussion 2 (Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U2D2 analysis. Again, draw from normative theories of ethics as part of your analysis.

First Digital Dropbox Assignment: Upload a color scan of your Wayne State University OneCard onto the Blackboard Digital Dropbox tool in .jpg format. Do not actually email  the .jpg file, but, attach it and upload it onto the Blackboard. Digital Dropbox. For more detailed instructions, see the Online Technology and Skills page of the syllabus. Prof. Spalding uses the scan to verify the identity of students (presentation, online office hours, final exam, etc.).
Also due at 6:00 p.m.:
Quiz #2 on Unit Two,  and Survey # 2.
10/05/2009, Monday Online Midterm Exam I. Date and Time:  Part I ("multiple choice" portion) and Part II ("short essay" portion) of Midterm Exam  I are due on or before 11:00 p.m.on 10/05/2009. This exam is a "take-home" exam, available to the student at the Course Documents section of the Blackboard site for this course approximately 30 hours prior to that due date and time. The text of the short essay questions may be made available sooner for student review and preparation. Part One (the multiple choice/true false portion) is completed on Blackboard in the same manner as quizzes. Part Two (short essay) is also separately completed on Blackboard in approximately the same manner as quizzes, but using complete and proper sentences. Part One (multiple choice) must be completed in one sitting within one hour of the time Part One is started. Part Two (short essay) must be completed separately in one sitting (not in the same session as Part One), within one hour of the time Part Two is started. Part One is graded automatically on Blackboard;  points for Part Two are posted within approximately one week.
10/12/2009, Monday
Second Digital DropBox assignment and Ethical Analysis U2D4 is
due at 6:00 p.m. on  10/12/2009,. At least one responsive U2D4 Reply is due at 11:00 p.m.
Unit 2, Discussion 4:  Write a summary of your Ethical Analysis as your Discussion Board message posting, including the case number and the name of the case that was assigned to you (see Step Four of the Ethical Analysis instruction page of your syllabus). Also, as part of that posting, attach your Ethical Analysis (in Word format) to your discussion U2D4 on the Discussion Board. The summary on the Discussion Board, and the uploading of the Ethical Analysis (in Word format), are due at 6:00 p.m. Unit 2, Discussion 4 (Reply): Provide at least one constructive and substantive reply in response to at least one other student's U2D4 ethical analysis. (see Step Five of the Ethical Analysis instruction page of your syllabus) Due by 11:00 p.m. Continue any thoughtful discussions as you deem appropriate. Second Digital DropBox Assignment: Five Proposed Research Issue Questions (See the Research Paper page of this syllabus).
10/19/2009, Monday
Unit Three
 

Your Initial Unit 3 Discussions, and the Quiz, are Due at 6:00 p.m. on  10/19/2009

Discussion Board Unit 3 Replies are Due at 11:00 p.m. on  10/19/2009

Primary Readings: Chapter 5, Corporations;   Case 5.1 ("Yahoo in China"); Case 5.2 ("Infant Formula");  Case 5.4 ("Free Speech"); Reading, p. 261 (Cassidy, "Greed Cycle"); Reading, p. 279 (DeGeorge, "Ethical Dilemmas"); p. 283 (Camenisch, "Heart of the Matter"); p. 450, (Werhane & Radin, "Employment at Will and Due Process"); p. 456 (Levine, "Libertarian Critque of Labor Unions");  Gregg, Samuel, "Corporate obligations should reflect stakeholders' best interests."
Additional Required Readings:
Lisa Bannon, "Beyond the Bubble: As Riches Fade, So Does Finance's Allure" Wall Street Journal, Sep 18, 2009. p. A.1; and
Damian Paletta, "Bankers Face Sweeping Curbs on Pay --- Fed Plans to Limit How Lenders Can Structure Compensation for Executives, Traders, Loan Officers; 5,000 Firms Affected," Wall Street Journal, Sep 18, 2009. p. A.1

Unit 3, Discussion 1:  Describe a second "real life" ethical dilemma or moral choice faced by you or a fellow worker in recent years. Explain how it was or was not resolved, and explain (using the Toulmin model) how it should have been resolved and why. Remember not to disclose specific trade secrets or confidential information about your employer, client, etc. Unit 3, Discussion 1 (Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U3D1 analysis.
Unit 3, Discussion 2: Respond to the following question (and feel free to enter into discussions with other students):  "For products or services that are both legal and profitable, should the board of directors of a corporation ever impose ethical limits (other than the legal limits and the limits imposed by the marketplace) on what is sold by the corporation?"  Avoid equivocation and answers such as, "It depends."  Come to a specific Yes or No conclusion, and justify your answer. Draw from the readings, and outside research on the Web or otherwise, to support your answer. Cite all references.
Unit 3, Discussion 2 (Reply):
Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U3D2 analysis. 
Quiz #3. 
10/26/2009, Monday
Argumentative Essay and second email asssignment are due at 6:00 p.m. on 10/26/2009.
U3D3 Replies are due at 11:00 p.m. 
How to write an Essay; Also: 16 Fallacies; 42 Fallacies; Directory of FallaciesQuick Review and Self-Test (Toulmin;  Fallacies); Damer: Chapters IV through VI.
Additional Required Readings: 
Kara Scannell and Craig Karmin, "SEC Weighs New Rules for Lending of Securities" Wall Street Journal, Sep 29, 2009. p. C.1;
Jing Yang, "China's Wind Farms Come With a Catch: Coal Plants" Wall Street Journal, Sep 28, 2009. p. A.17;
Cari Tuna, Nathan Koppel, and Michael Sanserino, "Theory & Practice: Employer Retaliation Claims Rise --- EEOC Says 23% More Such Charges Were Filed by Workers in Fiscal 2008" Wall Street Journal, Oct 5, 2009. p. B.7.
Unit 3, Discussion 3:  Write a 150 word (or less) summary of your Argumentative Essay, as your Discussion Board posting. Also, as part of that posting, attach your two- to five-page Argumentative Essay (in Word format) to your discussion U3D3 on the Discussion Board. Do not use the Digital Drop Box for your argumentative essay. Name your Word file as follows:  LastName-FirstInitial-ArgumentativeEssay.doc. So, Lisa Jones' argumentative essay would be Jones-L-ArgumentativeEssay.doc. The Subject line of your entry should be "Argumentative Essay from ___________."  Due by  6 p.m. Unit 3, Discussion 3 (Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply in response to at least one other student's U3D3 argumentative essay. Due by 11:00 p.m. Email Assignment # 2  Review the available times for the Part III Oral Exam (on the Announcements page of Blackboard, within several days of the deadline for this assignment). Let Prof. Spalding know by email whether you will be taking the written Part Three of the final exam, or, want to schedule a 10 or 15 minute online interview instead. If you are opting out of the closed book, closed notes in-person exam, suggest three preferred interview times (from  the Announcements on Blackboard for the schedule of dates and times). See the Exams page for details.
11/02/2009, Monday
Unit Four
 

Initial Unit 4 Discussions and Quiz #4 are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 11/02/2009

Discussion Board Unit 4 Replies are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 11/02/2009

 Primary Readings: Chapter 6, Consumers;  Case 6.2 ("Hot Coffee at McDonald's); Case 6.3 ("Sniffing Glue could Snuff Profits"); Case 6.4 ("Drug Dilemmas"); Case 6.5 ("Closing the Deal"); Readings p.337 (Carson, "Ethics of Sales"); p.345 (Phillips, "Manipulative Advertising");  p.356 (Schor, "Consume so Much"); Damer: Chapters VII through IX; "Defining and Developing an Effective Code of Conduct for Organizations"; Boeing Co. Code of Conduct
Additional Required Readings:
Matthew Dolan and Jeff Bennett, "Fire Fear In Fords Prompts Big Recall" Wall Street Journal, Oct 14, 2009. p. B.1;
M.P. McQueen, "U.S. News: Insurers Drop Drywall Victims --- Some Homeowner Policies Canceled After Claims Involving Defective Chinese Product" Wall Street Journal, Oct 14, 2009. p. A.4;
Diana Middleton "Executive Education: M.B.A.s Seek Social Change --- Enterprises With a Cause Gain Ground on Campus", Wall Street Journal,  Oct 15, 2009. p. B.7.

Unit 4, Discussion 1: Enter, word for word, your assigned research issue question once you receive your assigned topic from Prof. Spalding on your Digital DropBox. Unit 4, Discussion 1 (Reply): Provide a collegial, constructive, helpful, and substantive suggestion or observation to at least one student regarding their topic.
Unit 4, Discussion 2: Describe in your own words, you own idea of whether there is such a thing as a higher moral law. If so, how and when that higher moral law can be ascertained, and exactly what triggers its application (i.e., how do we know when we are about to violate it)?  If not, how do we determine the limits of human freedom (including human lawmaking) without a sense of a higher moral law?
Unit 4, Discussion 2(Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U4D2 analysis.








Quiz #4
11/09/2009, Monday Online Midterm Exam II. All exams are cumulative. Date and Time:   Part I ("multiple choice" portion) and Part II ("short essay" portion) of Midterm Exam  II are due on or before 11:00 p.m.on 11/09/2009. This exam is a "take-home" exam, available to the student at the Course Documents section of the Blackboard site for this course approximately 30 hours prior to that due date and time. The text of the short essay questions may be made available sooner for student review and preparation. Part One (the multiple choice/true false portion) is completed on Blackboard in the same manner as quizzes. Part Two (short essay) is also separately completed on Blackboard in approximately the same manner as quizzes, but using complete and proper sentences. Part One (multiple choice) must be completed in one sitting within one hour of the time Part One is started. Part Two (short essay) must be completed separately in one sitting (not in the same session as Part One), within one hour of the time Part Two is started. Part One is graded automatically on Blackboard;  points for Part Two are posted within approximately one week.
11/16/2009, Monday
Unit Five

Quiz #5, Survey # 3, Third Digital DropBox Assignments, initial U5D1 and U5D2 Discussions, Quiz, are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 11/16/2009.

Discussion Board U5D1 and U5D2 Replies are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 11/16/2009.

Primary Readings: Chapter 7, The Environment; Case 7.2 ("Poverty & Pollution"); Case 7.3 ("Rewrapping the Big Mac");  Case 7.4 ("Fordasaurus");  Case 8.4 ("Old Smoke"); Reading,  p. 398 (Singer, "Nonhumans"); Reading, p. 404 (Hoffman, "Environmental Ethics"); Damer Chapter X; Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5263, 2008 WL 2511219, 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7825, U.S., June 25, 2008 (No. 07-219); Brochure on EMS: Your Business Advantage (PDF 429K)
Additional Required Readings: 
Cari Tuna, "Theory & Practice: 'Contractor' Label Provokes Legal Disputes --- Employers, Workers Clash on Pay and Benefits; IRS to Take Closer Look at Classifications", Wall Street Journal,  Oct 19, 2009. p. B.8;
Amy Merrick, "Case Spurs Pharmacies' Fears Of Lawsuits Over Drug Abuse", Wall Street Journal,  Oct 28, 2009. p. A.1;
David Kesmodel, "Lawsuit Accuses Anheuser Of Bias", Wall Street Journal,  Oct 28, 2009. p. B.1.
Unit 5, Discussion 1. Write a short policy statement ( 4 or 5 sentences maximum) asserting the relative importance of the human priority (as compared to other considerations such as the freedom of species to expand or move their habitats; animal rights generally; and aesthetics). Clearly state the extent to which the human priority is higher than, equal to, or less than such other considerations, and provide support for your claim. Document your support using the Turabian/Chicago style.
Unit 5, Discussion 1
(Reply): Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U5D1 analysis.


Quiz #5; Survey # 3, Third Digital DropBox Assignment:  Name, title, and organization affiliation of your research paper interviewee (along with your questions)
submitted in confidence to Prof. Spalding.

11/23/2009
Unit Six 
 

Initial Unit 6 Discussions, Fourth Digital DropBox Assignment and Quiz are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 11/23/2009

Discussion Board Unit 6 Replies are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 11/23/2009

Primary Readings: Shaw and Barry, Chapter 8, Moral Choices Facing Employees; Case 10.1 ("Changing Jobs and Changing Loyalties");  Case 10.5 ("Ethically Dubious Conduct");  Reading, p. 570 (Soles, "Loyalty"); p. 598 (Davis, "Whistleblowing");  Albert Spalding, "Loyalty in the Workplace: To What End?" Philosophy in the Contemporary World, Spring 2007, pp. 50-59.
Additional Required Readings:
Roger Cheng, "Corporate News: AT&T Sues Verizon" Wall Street Journal, Nov 4, 2009. p. B.4.


Unit 6, Discussion 1. Explain, using solid argumentation while avoiding fallacies, why you agree or disagree with Shlomo Maital's commentary about greed and capitalism (see the reading assigned at the outset of this course). Draw from your lecture notes, readings, or other sources in support of your argument. Demonstrate your progress in both critical thinking and ethical theory, as opposed to your U1D3 discussion.
Unit 6, Discussion 1(Reply).
Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U6D1 analysis.
Unit 6, Discussion 2:  Respond to the following question (and feel free to enter into discussion with other students):  "Is whistleblowing wrong?  Explain." Avoid equivocation and answers such as, "It depends."  Come to a specific Yes or No conclusion, and justify your claim(s) with support in the style of Toulmin Argumentation. Draw from the readings, and outside research on the Web or otherwise, to justify your answer. Cite all references.
Unit 6, Discussion 2 (Reply): Provide a at least one constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U6D2 analysis.
Quiz #6;  
Fourth Digital DropBox Assignment.  Let Prof. Spalding know on the Digital DropBox whether you will be presenting your research in person on 12/07/2009, or via video upload onto the Discussion Board. 
11/30/2009
Unit Six (Continued)
 

Initial U6D3 and U6D4 Discussions, and Fifth Digital DropBox Assignment are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 11/30/2009.

Discussion Board Unit 6 Replies are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 11/30/2009.
Primary Readings: "Defining and Developing an Effective Code of Conduct for Organizations"; Boeing Co. Code of Conduct.  David Crawford and Mike Esterl, "Siemens Ruling Details Bribery Across the Globe," Wall Street Journal, November 16, 2007, p. A1,  Including Data in Siemens Case (Available on Blackboard). Also read The MBA Oath and view the serious video and, if you wish, optionally vew the non-serious video regarding The MBA Oath.
Additional Required Readings:
None.
Unit 6, Discussion 3: List (by copying and pasting into your U6D4 discussion - don't worry about formatting), using proper citation format, your bibliography of scholarly journal articles [e.g., law review article(s), ethics journal article(s), other scholarly journal articles, etc.] you plan to reference in support of your research paper. The Subject line should indicate "Research Bibliography by ________" with the student's name indicated. Copy and paste this information as your U6D3 Discussion, but also upload the Word file, containing the same information, onto the Digital DropBox as your Fourth Digital DropBox Assignment.
Unit 6, Discussion 3(Reply): Make at least one suggestion, to at least one other student, of a scholarly article (i.e., law review article, ethics journal article, or other scholarly journal article) that would, in your opinion, help your colleague(s) with their research paper.
Unit 6, Discussion 4: Attach your Research Presentation Handout (in Word format) to your discussion U6D4 on the Discussion Board. The Subject line should indicate "Research Presentation Handout by ________" with the student's name indicated. Unit 6, Discussion 5 (Reply): Provide a collegial, constructive and substantive suggestion or observation to at least one student regarding their topic, including, where appropriate, suggestions for additional research resources. Do not select the same student(s) as you selected at U4D1 or U6D3. Instead, select a different student whose U6D4 posting has not received any, or many, replies.
Fifth Digital DropBox Assignment: Upload your current version of your Bibliography for your Research Paper. Make sure it includes at least of each each required type of article listed on the Research Paper page of this syllabus. You will probably add more references to your Bibliography by the time you complete your paper, but at this point you should have at least the minimum required references in hand.
12/07/2009 Monday
In-Class Session at 6:00 p.m. On-Site on Main Campus (Room 23 Prentis Building, 5201 Cass Avenue Main Campus).
-- or --
RPD1 video presentations are due online at  6:00 p.m. on 12/07/2009.
Research Presentations by those students who chose (at their Fourth Digital DropBox Assignment) not to upload their presentation onto the Discussion Board. Students who chose not to upload their video presentation must attend the in-class session, and should print and bring to class a dozen copies of their own Research Presentation Handout. This is the same handout that the student uploaded at his or her U6D1 discussion. Students who chose to upload their presentation should not plan to attend the in-class session.
Research Presentation, Discussion 1. For those students who chose to upload their video presentation onto the Discussion Board, their five to ten minute presentation must be uploaded as an attachment to the RPD1 discussion thread by 6:00 p.m. The Subject line should indicate "Video Presentation by ________" with the student's name indicated.
Research Presentation, Discussion 1 (Reply).
For all students: Provide a constructive and substantive question in response least one other student's RPD1 uploaded video presentation. Due 12/07/2009 by 11:00 p.m.  Select a student for whom a fewer number of questions have already been asked, so that you not "pile on" any one or two students.
Research Presentation
, Discussion 1(Follow-Up). Only for those students who chose to upload their video presentation onto the Discussion Board:  Provide a constructive and substantive follow-up or answer to at least one RPD1 Reply. Due 12/08/2009 by 11:00 p.m.
None.
12/14/2009, Monday Final Research Paper is due online due on or before 11:00 p.m. on 12/14/2009 on Blackboard:  the electronic version in Word is submitted on Blackboard using the StuDigital dent DropBox. A paper version ("hard copy") of the research paper is required in addition to the electronic version, and may be either faxed to (313) 577-2000, or delivered to the Department of Accounting office in 100 Rands House on Main Campus (see address above), as late as noon on the 12/16/2009 ... so long as the electronic copy of the Word document computer file of the research paper has already been previously uploaded onto the Digital DropBox on Blackboard no later than 11:00 p.m. on 12/16/2009. If you plan to fax your paper, do not ask for, and do not expect, a confirmation of the receipt of your fax; if you are unsure about sending a fax, choose another delivery method (e.g., hand delivery, Fedex, etc.). Also, if plan to fax your paper, do not wait until the last minute to fax your paper, as the fax line will likely be busy and you will miss the deadline.
12/21/2009, Monday
Final Exam Parts One and Two are due at 6 pm.


Online Final Exam. All exams are cumulative. Date and Time:  Part I ("multiple choice" portion) and Part II ("short essay" portion) of the Final Exam are due on or before 6:00 p.m.on 12/21/2009. This exam is a "take-home" exam, available to the student at the Course Documents section of the Blackboard site for this course approximately 30 hours prior to the due date and time. The text of the short essay questions may be made available sooner for student review and preparation. Part One (the multiple choice/true false portion) is completed on Blackboard in the same manner as quizzes. Part Two (short essay) is also separately completed on Blackboard in approximately the same manner as quizzes, but using complete and proper sentences. Part One (multiple choice) must be completed in one sitting within one hour of the time Part One is started. Part Two (short essay) must be completed separately in one sitting (not in the same session as Part One), within one hour of the time Part Two is started. Part One is graded automatically on Blackboard;  points for Part Two are posted within approximately one week. 
12/21/2009, Monday
Final Exam Part Three (for those students who did not already elect and do the online interview in November) is at 7:30 pm. sharp in Room 23 Prentis Building
In-Person Part Three of the Final Exam. The third in-class (closed book, closed notes) 50-minute part of the final exam is worth 50 points and will take place on 12/21/2009 is at 7:30 pm. sharp in on Main Campus (Room 23 Prentis Building, 5201 Cass Avenue Main Campus). Bring pencils and a good eraser only, to the in-class part of the exam. All paper will be provided. This part of the exam will emphasize vocabulary and definitions, and may be in the form of a crossword puzzle. Optional Online Oral Exam. Instead of taking this in-person, closed book, closed notes written exam, students may have chosen at Email Assignmnent # 2 to schedule a fifteen-minute (or so) online oral exam ealier in the semester. This required the use of a web cam, and was scheduled during the last third of the course. For information about this option, see the Exams page of this syllabus and the Online Technology and Skills page of this syllabus. Students who, for any reason, did not successfully schedule and take the optional online oral exam, are required to take the in-person closed book closed notes exam on 12/21/2009 at 7:30 p.m.

This syllabus will be updated continually.