
| Approx. Points** |
Approx. Percent** |
|
| Task Points: Email assignments, Quizzes, Surveys, Discussion Board participation, Research Paper presentation, etc., including slack points. | 305 |
22 % |
| Ethical
Analysis |
100 |
7 % |
| Mid-Term
Exams |
300 | 21 % |
| Argumentative
Essay |
100 |
7 % |
| Research Paper | 200 | 14 % |
| Final Exam | 400 | 29 % |
Schedule of AssignmentsNote: if you have trouble with some of the links on this page, try accessing this page from a campus computer, or by configuring your browser to the WSU proxy server. |
|||
| Unit
and Due Dates and Times† |
Readings
Due Prior to Discussion and Quiz (Draw from these Readings when
Completing
Discussion and Quiz Due at 6:00 p.m.. |
Discussion
Questions, Completed on Discussion Board Prior to Deadline Due at 6:00 p.m. However, when there is both a Part A and a Part B, Part A initial Discussion Board postings, are Due at 6:00 p.m.. Part B Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00p.m. |
Other
Items Due to be Submitted Prior to Deadline Due at 6:00 p.m.: |
| 01/08/2007,
Monday Introduction Note: Survey # 1, First Email Assignment, Initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1A, U1D2A, and U1D3A), and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007, but may be submitted earlier. Quiz # 1 is also due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007, but is not available until 01/15/2007 per the Quizzes and Surveys (Online Section) page of this syllabus. |
Primary Readings:
This
syllabus and all attachments listed at the bottom of this
syllabus. Pay special attention to the following attachment: How to Study for BA 7070. View the introductory lecture on Blackboard. Additional Readings: Joseph R. DesJarins, "Virtues and Business Ethics"; Dunham, Kemba, "Right and Wrong: What's Ethical in Business?," Wall Street Journal, Jan. 11, 1999; Amitai Etzioni "When It Comes to Ethics, B-Schools Get an F," Washington Post, August 4, 2002 (Only these three readings are available in the Course Documents area of the Blackboard site for this course; for information about future Wall Street Journal readings, see above.) |
None due at 6:00 p.m.on 01/08/2007. The Baseline Quiz and Survey # 1 may be taken on Blackboard prior to 6:00 p.m.on 01/08/2007. The First Email Assignment may also be emailed in proper form prior to 6:00 p.m.on 01/08/2007. The initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1A, U1D2A, and U1D3A) may also be completed prior to 6:00 p.m.on 01/09/2007. Also, correct your address on Pipeline if you are not using the University AccessID as your primary email. Log in to WSU Pipeline and click the "Account" icon in the upper right hand corner of the page. In the "Account Management Menu", click "Set Mail Forwarding". Specify your primary email address, and desired options, and click "OK". Make sure your email address on Pipeline is precisely accurate, so that you will not miss out on any emails "broadcast" to the entire class from the Blackboard system. Note: Survey # 1, First Email Assignment, initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1A, U1D2A, and U1D3A), and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007, but may be submitted earlier. | |
| 01/16/2007,
Tuesday Unit One: Survey # 1, First Email Assignment, Initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1A, U1D2A, and U1D3A), Quiz # 1 and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007. Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions (U1D1B, U1D2B, and U1D3B) are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007. Note: Survey # 1, First Email Assignment, initial Discussion Board postings (U1D1A, U1D2A, and U1D3A), and Baseline Quiz, are due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007, but may be submitted earlier. Quiz # 1 is also due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007, but is not available until 01/15/2007 per the Quizzes and Surveys (Online Section) page of this syllabus.
|
Primary Readings: Shaw and Barry,
Chapter
2: Normative
Theories
of Ethics; Case 2.1 ("Hacking into Harvard"); Case 2.3
("Blood"); Case 6.2 ("Web Porn at Work"); Reading, p.85
(Hare, "Philosopher's Approach"); Reading, p. 92 (Green, "Moral
Justification"); Damer:
Introduction, and Chapters I, II, and III. Additional Readings: Benjamin Brewer, "Fewer Freebies, More Patient Time Since Doctor Said No to Drug Reps" Wall Street Journal, January 9, 2007; Page B9; Thomas M. Burton, "Cognitive Dissonance: Why Some Patients Get No Help After Brain Injury" Wall Street Journal, January 8, 2007, Page A1; Alan Murray, "When Firms Turn to Lawyers" Wall Street Journal, January 10, 2007, Page A11; Wall Street Journal Video: CNBC, the trend of lawyers-as-CEO. |
Unit 1, Discussion 1A: After
reading the Discussion
Board page of the syllabus from top to bottom, introduce
yourself, on the Blackboard Discussion Board site for this course, to
the
other students in this course. Include general employment
information
and/or any other
information
you would care to share with your classmates. Describe your MBA/MS
degree
experience to date, and expectations from your graduate studies. You
may, if you wish, attach a photo of yourself. Due by 6:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 1B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U1D1 expectations, experience, or other observations. Feel free to enter into a respectful discussion, regarding expectations, employment, education, etc. Due by 11:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 2A: Page 91, Question 6. Give a full analysis and explanation for your conclusion(s). Do not repeat another student's prior analysis. Due by 6:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 2B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U1D2 analysis. Due by 11:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 3A: Respond to the following question (and feel free to enter into discussion with other students): "Is greed wrong? Explain." Avoid equivocation and answers such as, "It depends." Come to a specific Yes or No conclusion, and justify your answer. Draw from the readings (especially Chapter 2), and outside research on the Web or otherwise, to justify your answer. Cite all references. Due by 6:00 p.m. Unit 1, Discussion 2B: Provide a at least one constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U1D2 analysis. Due by 11:00 p.m. |
Survey # 1, First Email Assignment, Initial
Discussion Board postings (U1D1A, U1D2A, and U1D3A), and Baseline Quiz,
are due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007, but may be
submitted earlier. Quiz # 1 is also due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/16/2007but
is not available until 01/15/2007
per the Quizzes
and Surveys (Online Section) page of this
syllabus. After 01/16/2007: Start on Unit Two: View Introduction to Unit Two (lecture) on Blackboard. |
| 01/22/2007,
Monday Unit Two Survey # 2, Initial Unit 2 Discussions, Quiz #2, and second email assignment are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/22/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 01/22/2007 |
Primary Readings: Shaw and Barry,
Chapter
8, Moral
Choices Facing
Employees; Case 8.1
("Changing
Jobs and Changing Loyalties"); Case 8.5 ("Ethically Dubious
Conduct"); Case 6.2 ("Malt"); Reading, p. 419 (Soles, "Loyalty"); p.
445 (Davis, "Whistleblowing"); Damer: Chapters IV
through VI.; Definitions of Malum in Se versus Malum Prohibitum; Toulmin Model of Argument; Toulmin Argumentation; Additional Readings: Cassell Bryan-Low, "How Legal Codes Can Hinder Hacker Cases" Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2007, Page A8; Julia Angwin, "MySpace Moves to Give Parents More Information" Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2007, Page B1. |
Unit 2, Discussion
1A:
Describe
a "real life" ethical dilemma or moral choice faced by you or a fellow
worker in recent years. Explain how it was or was not resolved,
and
explain (using the Toulmin model) how it should have been resolved and
why. Remember not to disclose specific trade secretrs or confidential
information about your employer, client, etc. Unit 2, Discussion 1B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U2D1 analysis. Unit 2, Discussion 2: Respond to the following question (and feel free to enter into discussion with other students): "Is whistleblowing wrong? Explain." Avoid equivocation and answers such as, "It depends." Come to a specific Yes or No conclusion, and justify your claim(s) with support in the style of Toulmin Argumentation. Draw from the readings, and outside research on the Web or otherwise, to justify your answer. Cite all references. Unit 2, Discussion 2B: Provide a at least one constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U2D2 analysis. |
Quiz #2; Second Email Assignment: Five Proposed Research Issue Questions; Survey # 2 |
| 01/25/2007 | The 2006/2007 George R. Husband
Distinguished Lecture will be given by Claudius
Modesti, Director of
Enforcement and Investigations with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (PCAOB) on Thursday, January 25, 2007, in the McGregor
Memorial Conference Center from 2:30-3:30 p.m.
Mr. Modesti's lecture is titled "Thoughts on Deterring Auditor
Misconduct in the Post-Enron World." Students in Prof. Spalding's course who attend the (entire) Distinguished Lecture and who seek out and sign in on Prof. Spalding's sign-in attendance sheet (available at the Lecture) will earn five (5) extra credit points. |
||
| 01/29/2007,
Monday Ethical Analysis U2D3A is due at 6:00 p.m. on 01/29/2007. At least one responsive U2D3B discussion due at 11:00 p.m. |
Unit 2,
Discussion 3A: Write
a summary of your Ethical
Analysis as your Discussion Board message posting, including the
case
number and the name of the case that was assigned to you (see Step Four of the
Ethical
Analysis instruction page of your syllabus). Also,
as part of
that posting, attach your Ethical Analysis (in Word format) to your
discussion U2D3 on the
Discussion Board. The summary on the Discussion Board, and the
uploading of the Ethical Analysis (in Word format), are due at 6:00 p.m. Unit 2, Discussion 3B: Provide at least one constructive and substantive reply in response to at least one other student's U2D3 ethical analysis. (see Step Five of the Ethical Analysis instruction page of your syllabus) Due by 11:00 p.m. Continue any thoughtful discussions as you deem appropriate. |
||
| 02/05/2007,
Monday Unit Three Initial Unit 3 Discussions, Quiz, are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 02/05/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 02/05/2007 |
Primary Readings: Chapter 10, Consumers;
Case 10.2 ("Hot Coffee at McDonald's);
Case
10.3 ("Sniffing Glue could Snuff Profits"); Case 10.4 ("Drug
Dilemmas"); Reading p. 555 (Phillips,
"Manipulative Advertising"); Reading p. 565 (Schor,
"Consume so Much"); Damer: Chapters VII through IX; Pointers
for Structuring Written Arguments; How to write an Essay; Also: 16 Fallacies; 42 Fallacies; Directory of Fallacies; Quick Review and Self-Test (Toulmin; Fallacies). Additional Readings: Theo Francis, "Medical Dilemma: Spread of Records Stirs Patient Fears Of Privacy Erosion" Wall Street Journal, December 26, 2006, Page A1; Perri Capell, "How to Handle an Employee With Substance-Abuse Issues," Wall Street Journal, December 12, 2006, Page B10; Jess Bravin, "Unions' Policy Test" Wall Street Journal, January 8, 2007, Page A8; David Reilly, "Big Accounting Firms Still Pay for Scandalst" Wall Street Journal, January 13, 2007, Page B5; Kris Hudson, "Gender-Discrimination Suit Against Costco Gets Class-Action Statust" Wall Street Journal, January 13, 2007, Page B3; Alan Murray, "Executive's Fatal Flaw: Failing to Understand New Demands on CEOs" Wall Street Journal, January 4, 2007; Page A1. |
Unit 3, Discussion 1A:
Describe
a second "real life" ethical dilemma or moral choice faced by you or a
fellow
worker in recent years. Explain how it was or was not resolved,
and
explain (using the Toulmin model) how it should have been resolved and
why. Remember not to disclose specific trade secretrs or confidential
information about your employer, client, etc. Unit 3, Discussion 1B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U3D1 analysis. Unit 3, Discussion 2A: Respond to the following question (and feel free to enter into discussion with other students): "For products or services that are both legal and profitable, should the board of directors of a corporation ever impose ethical limits (other than the legal limits and the limits imposed by the marketplace) on what is sold by the corporation?" Avoid equivocation and answers such as, "It depends." Come to a specific Yes or No conclusion, and justify your answer. Draw from the readings, and outside research on the Web or otherwise, to support your answer. Cite all references. Unit 3, Discussion 2B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U3D2 analysis. |
Quiz #3. |
| 02/12/2007, Monday | Online Midterm Exam I. Date and Time: Part I ("multiple choice" portion) and Part II ("short essay" portion) of Midterm Exam I are due on or before 11:00 p.m..on 02/12/2007. This exam is a "take-home" exam, available to the student at the Course Documents section of the Blackboard site for this course approximately 30 hours prior to that due date and time.. The text of the short essay questions may be made available sooner for student review and preparation. Part One (the multiple choice/true false portion) is completed on Blackboard in the same manner as quizzes. Part Two (short essay) is also separately completed on Blackboard in approximately the same manner as quizzes, but using complete and proper sentences. Part One (multiple choice) must be completed in one sitting within one hour of the time Part One is started. Part Two (short essay) must be completed separately in one sitting (not in the same session as Part One), within one hour of the time Part Two is started. Part One is graded automatically on Blackboard; points for Part Two are posted within approximately one week. | ||
| 02/19/2007,
Monday Unit Four Initial Unit 4 Discussions and Quiz, are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 02/19/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 02/19/2007 |
Primary Readings: Chapter 11, The
Environment;
Case 11.3 ("Rewrapping the Big
Mac");
Case 11.4 ("Fordasaurus"); Case 6.4 ("Old Smoke"); Reading,
p. 612
(Hoffman,
"Business and Environmental Ethics"); Reading, p. 190 ("Ethics in
Capitalism"); S. Fred Singer, Climate Policy—From Rio to Kyoto: A Political Issue for 2000—and Beyond, Hoover Institution.; Brochure on EMS: Your Business Advantage (PDF 429K); Additional Readings: Julia Angwin, "MySpace Moves to Give Parents More Information" Wall Street Journal, January 17, 2007, Page B1; Ronald Alsop, "How Boss's Deeds Buff A Firm's Reputation" Wall Street Journal, January 31, 2007, Page B1; Jennifer Levitz and Emily Steel, "Boston Stunt Draws Legal, Ethical Fire" Wall Street Journal, February 2, 2007; Page B3; Suzanne Vranica, "Watching Super Bowl Ads Could Make Viewers Cringe" Wall Street Journal, February 2, 2007; Page B1. |
Unit 4, Discussion 1A: Enter,
word for
word, your assigned research issue question once you receive your
assigned
topic from Prof. Spalding via email. Unit 4, Discussion 1B: Provide a collegial, constructive, helpful, and substantive suggestion or observation to at least one student regarding their topic. Unit 4, Discussion 2A. Write a short policy statement ( 4 or 5 sentences maximum) asserting the relative importance of the human priority (as compared to other consiiderations such as the freedom of species to expand or move their habitats; animal rights generally; and aesthetics). Clearly state the extent to which the human priority is higher than, equal to, or less than such other considerations, and provide support for your claim. Unit 4, Discussion 2B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U4D2 analysis. |
Quiz #4; |
| 02/26/2007,
Monday Unit Five Initial Unit 5 Discussions, Quiz, Survey # 3 and Email Assignment # 3 are Duee at 6:00 p.m. on 02/26/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 02/26/2007 |
Primary Readings: Chapter
1, The Nature
of Morality; Case 1.1 ("Dumped"); Case 6.5 ("Union
Discrimination"); Case 7.1 ("Unprofessional Conduct"); Case
10.5 ("Closing the Deal"); Reading, p. 33 (Solomon, "It's Good
Business");
Reading, p. 42 (Luban et al, "Moral Responsibility"); Reading,
p. 198 ("International Sweatshops"). Hasnas, John, "The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed." Business Ethics Quarterly (Jan. 1998); Andrew Fastow Plea Agreement and Statement (Note: Peruse the plea agreement, but carefully read the statement at Exhibit A); 181 South Inc. v. Fischer, No. 05-1882 (3d Cir. N.J. July 18, 2006); Additional Readings: Betsy Mckay, "State Probes Coke-Nestle Drink Claims" Wall Street Journal, February 6, 2007, Page B15; Miriam Jordan and Valerie Bauerlein, "Bank of America Casts Wider Net For Hispanics" Wall Street Journal, February 13, 2007, Page A1; Ann Keeton and Stephen Wisnefski, "JetBlue Unveils Customer Bill Of Right After Service Snafus" Wall Street Journal, February 21, 2007, Page A4. |
Unit 5, Discussion
1A:
Write a one-sentence ethical claim -- connected to, drawn from, or
associated with your assigned research topic -- that you plan to
support and defend in your argumentative
essay. Unit 5, Discussion 1B: Provide a collegial, constructive, helpful, and substantive suggestion or observation to at least one student regarding their ethical claim. Unit 5, Discussion 2A: Describe in your own words, you own idea of whether there is such a thing as a higher moral law. If so, how and when that higher moral law can be ascertained, and exactly what triggers its application (i.e., how do we know when we are about to violate it)? If not, how do we determine the limits of human freedom (including human lawmaking) without a sense of a higher moral law? Unit 5, Discussion 2B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U5D2 analysis. |
Quiz
#5; Survey
# 3; Email
Assignment # 3: Name, title, and organization affiliation of
your research
paper interviewee (along with your questions) emailed in confidence to Prof. Spalding. |
| 03/05/2007,
Monday Argumentative Essay due at 6:00 p.m. on 03/05/2007. Responsive discussion due at 11:00 p.m. |
Unit
5,
Discussion 3A: Write
a 150 word (or less) summary of your Argumentative
Essay, as your Discussion Board posting. Also, as part of
that posting, attach your
two- to five-page Argumentative Essay (in Word format) to your
discussion U5D3 on the
Discussion Board. Do not use the Digital Drop Box for your
argumentative essay. Name your Word file as follows:
LastName-FirstInitial-ArgumentativeEssay.doc. So, Lisa Jones'
argumentative essay would be Jones-L-ArgumentativeEssay.doc. The
Subject line of your entry should be "Argumentative Essay from
___________." Due by 6 p.m. Unit 5, Discussion 3B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply in response to at least one other student's U5D3 argumentative essay. Due by 11:00 p.m. |
||
| 03/12/2007 | Spring Break |
||
| 03/19/2007,
Monday Unit Six Initial Unit 6 Discussions, Email Assignment # 4 and Quiz are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 03/19/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 03/19/2007 |
Primary Readings: Chapter
4, The Nature
of Capitalism; Reading, p. 190 (Sen, "Markets and the Role of
Ethics
in Capitalism"); Reading, p. 198 (Maitland, "The Great Non-Debate over
International Sweatshops"); Reading, p. 318 (Levine, "Labor
Unions"); Case 4.4 ("An
Internet Parasite");
Reading, Younkins, Edward W., "Morality
and Character Development: The Roles of Capitalism, Commerce, and the
Corporation;" Maital, Shlomo, "More than Greed" (Available in the
Course Documents section of Blackboard); Beckey Bright, "Managing Corporate Social Responsibility," Wall Street Journal, Mar 03, 2007, Page B1; Boeing Co. Code of Conduct. Additional Readings: Jess Bravin and Vanessa O'Connell, "High Court Throws Out Verdict Against Phillip Morris," Wall Street Journal, February 21, 2007, Page A2; Suzanne Barlyn, "Putting Return Policies to the Test," Wall Street Journal, February 22, 2007, Page D3; Janet Adamy and Roger Thurow, "Ethiopia Battles Starbucks Over Rights to Coffee Names," Wall Street Journal, March 5, 2007, Page A1; WSJ News Roundup, "Former Officers at Gateway Liable for Fraud," Wall Street Journal, March 9, 2007, Page B4. |
Unit Six, Discussion 1A: List,
using
proper citation format, the ethics journal article(s) and law review
article(s)
you plan to reference in support of your research paper. All students:
attach your Research
Presentation Handout
(in Word format) to your discussion U6D1A
on the Discussion Board. Unit 6, Discussion 1B: Provide a collegial, constructive and substantive suggestion or observation to at least one student regarding their topic, including, where appropriate, suggestions for additional research resources. Do not select the same student(s) as you selected at U4D1B or U5D1B. Instead, select a different student whose U6D1 posting has not received any, or many, replies. Unit 6, Discussion 2A. Explain, using solid argumentation while avoiding fallacies, why you agree or disagree with Shlomo Maital's commentary about capitalism. Draw from your lecture notes, readings, or other sources in support of your argument. Unit 6, Discussion 2B. Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one other student's U6D2 analysis. |
Quiz
#6; Email Assignment # 4: Let Prof. Spalding know by email whether you will be presenting your research in person on 04/09/2007, or via video upload onto the Discussion Board. |
| 03/26/2007, Monday | Online Midterm Exam II. All exams are cumulative. Date and Time: Part I ("multiple choice" portion) and Part II ("short essay" portion) of Midterm Exam II are due on or before 11:00 p.m..on 03/26/2007. This exam is a "take-home" exam, available to the student at the Course Documents section of the Blackboard site for this course approximately 30 hours prior to that due date and time.. The text of the short essay questions may be made available sooner for student review and preparation. Part One (the multiple choice/true false portion) is completed on Blackboard in the same manner as quizzes. Part Two (short essay) is also separately completed on Blackboard in approximately the same manner as quizzes, but using complete and proper sentences. Part One (multiple choice) must be completed in one sitting within one hour of the time Part One is started. Part Two (short essay) must be completed separately in one sitting (not in the same session as Part One), within one hour of the time Part Two is started. Part One is graded automatically on Blackboard; points for Part Two are posted within approximately one week. | ||
| 04/02/2007, Monday Unit Seven Initial Unit 7 Discussions, and Quiz are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 04/02/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 04/02/2007 |
Primary Readings: Chapter 5, Corporations;
Case 5.2 ("Infant
Formula"); Case 5.4 ("Free Speech"); Reading, p. 246 (Cassidy,
"Greed Cycle"); Reading, p. 263 (DeGeorge, "Ethical Dilemmas"); p. 267
(Camenisch,
"Heart
of the Matter"). Additional Reading(s): Article: Gregg, Samuel, "Corporate obligations should reflect stakeholders' best interests;" Susanne Craig, "Court Reverses Perelman Award On Point of Law," Wall Street Journal, March 22, 2007, Page C1l; Jane Spencer, "Pollution Violators in China Are Cited by Nonprofit Groups," Wall Street Journal, March 21, 2007, Page B5. |
Unit 7, Discussion 1A:
List,
using proper
citation format, the business journal feature article(s) you plan to
reference
in support of your research paper. Unit 7, Discussion 1B: Provide a collegial, constructive and substantive suggestion or observation to at least one student regarding their topic, including, where appropriate, suggestions for additional research resources. Do not select the same students as you selected at U4D1B, U5D1B or U6D1B. Instead, select a different student whose U7D1 posting has not received any, or many, replies. Unit 7, Discussion 2. Describe your research paper interviewee, including the person's title or role in the business organization, type of business, and at least five questions that you propose to ask the individual. Do not include the interviewee's name (or the organization's name) on the Discussion Board. |
Quiz #7. |
| 04/09/2007 In-Class Session at 6:00 p.m. On-Site on Main Campus (Room 103 Rands House, 5229 Cass Avenue Main Campus). -- or -- U9D1 video presentations are due online at 6:00 p.m. on 04/09/2007. |
Research Presentations by those students who choose not to upload their presentations onto the Discussion Board. Students who attend should print (from U6D1) and bring to class a copy of each of the other students' one page Research Presentation Handout | Research
Presentation, Discussion 1A. For those students who choose
to upload
their video
presentation onto the Discussion Board, their five to ten minute
presentation must be
uploaded as an attachment to the RPD1 discussion thread by 6:00
p.m. The Subject line should indicate "Video Presentation by
________" with the student's name indicated. Research Presentation, Discussion 1B. For all students: Provide a constructive and substantive question in response least one other student's RPD1A video presentation. Due 04/10/2007 by 11:00 p.m. Select a student for whom a fewer number of questions have already been asked, so that you not "pile on" any one or two students. Research Presentation, Discussion 1C. Only for those students who chose to upload their video presentation onto the Discussion Board: Provide a constructive and substantive follow-up or answer to at least one RPD1B reply. Due 04/11/2007 by 11:00 p.m. |
None. |
| 04/16/2007, Monday Unit Eight Initial Unit 8 Discussions, and Quiz, are Due at 6:00 p.m. on 04/16/2007 Responsive and Follow-Up Discussions are Due at 11:00 p.m. on 04/16/2007 |
Primary Readings: Chapter 9, Job
Discrimination;
Case 9.4 ("Harassment"); Case 9.5
("Facial
Discrimination"); Reading, p. 256 (Orlando, "Downsizing");
Reading, p. 307 (Werhane and Radin, "Employment at Will"); Reading, p.
489 (Schultz, "Sanitized Workplace"). Additional Readings: None. |
Unit 8, Discussion 1A: Write
the
last five paragraphs of your research paper, in their current form,
along with an outline of your paper. The outline should include
headings and subheadings (and, where appropriate, sub-subheadings), and
should be sufficiently detailed so as to show the "flow" of your
ethical and legal arguments. Unit 8, Discussion 1B: Provide a constructive and substantive reply to at least one student regarding their U8D1 entry. Do not select the same students as you selected at U4D1B, U5D1B, U6D1B or U7D1B. Instead, select a different student whose U8D1 posting has not received any, or many, replies. |
Quiz
#8. |
| 04/23/2007, Monday | Final Research Paper is due online due on or before 11:00 p.m. on 04/23/2007 on Blackboard: the electronic version in Word is "Sent" on Blackboard using the Student Drop Box. Hard copy of the research paper is required in addition to the electronic version, and may be either faxed to (313) 577-2000, or delivered to the Department of Accounting oxffice in 100 Rands House on Main Campus (see address above), as late as noon on the 05/02/2006 ... so long as the electronic copy of the Word document computer file of the research paper has been previously Sent (i.e., uploaded) via the Student Drop Box on Blackboard no later than 11:00 p.m. on 04/23/2007. If you plan to fax your paper, do not ask for, and do not expect, a confirmation of the receipt of your fax; if you are unsure about sending a fax, choose another delivery method (e.g., hand delivery, Fedex, etc.). Also, if plan to fax your paper, do not wait until the last minute to fax your paper, as the fax line will likely be busy and you will miss the deadline. | ||
| 04/30/2007, Monday | Online Final Exam. All exams are cumulative. Date and Time: Part I ("multiple choice" portion) and Part II ("short essay" portion) of the Final Exam are due on or before 11:00 p.m..on 04/30/2007. This exam is a "take-home" exam, available to the student at the Course Documents section of the Blackboard site for this course approximately 30 hours prior to the due date and time. The text of the short essay questions may be made available sooner for student review and preparation. Part One (the multiple choice/true false portion) is completed on Blackboard in the same manner as quizzes. Part Two (short essay) is also separately completed on Blackboard in approximately the same manner as quizzes, but using complete and proper sentences. Part One (multiple choice) must be completed in one sitting within two hours of the time Part One is started. Part Two (short essay) must be completed separately in one sitting (not in the same session as Part One), within one hour of the time Part Two is started. Part One is graded automatically on Blackboard; points for Part Two are posted within approximately one week. | ||
*Only paid
subscribers to the Wall Street Journal are able to
"click through" to the article. Nonsubscribers should plan to find
their way to the assigned articles at a local public library, at one of
the WSU
libraries, or elsewhere. Students who obtain a student
subscription to the paper edition of Wall
Street Journal will automatically receive a subscription to
the Wall
Street
Journal Interactive Edition and will be able to
"click through" to the assigned Wall Street Journal articles
to obtain
copies.
To obtain a student subscription to the paper edition, click
here:
On Page 1 of the subscription form, be sure to enter 482 as the first
three digits of the Wayne State U. Zip code. On Part 2 of the
online
subscription form, be sure to enter ETHICS as the course for
which you are using the Journal,
and indicate Spalding, Albert
as your
referring professor.
**Subject to change slightly as the semester unfolds. Final
grade is based on the student's total points divided by the final
denominator
as determined at the end of the semester.
***Prior to each unit, peruse the Wall
Street Journal for recent articles.
†See How
to Study for an Online Section of BA 7070 for
details. Lectures introducing each unit are made available on
Blackboard at least four days prior to the due date for that unit.
†
†Note: if you have trouble with some of the links on this page,
try accessing this page from a campus computer, or by configuring your
browser to the WSU proxy server.